rbashir
12-08 09:29 AM
Guy,
I would first like to thank to all of you who are here to help each other and what a great effort IV is doing.
In my previous post http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=15889
I have requested for help in regards with how to address the ability to pay denial . I have recieved a lot of help for various members and also talking with attorney, here is what we are planning to do as far as the appeal is concern.
1 - Since my company was not paying the proffered wages from the year 2003 to 2006 ( in 2007 they are), my company is agreed to pay me the difference of the salary from the year 2003 in check and will right a statement as to why I didnt get the fully salary before.
2 - Company will provide the last 2-3 months of payroll statement which is more that a milliion dollar.
3 - An audited financial statement of 2007
4- My recent pay stubs
5 - My W2 from 2003-2006
6- Recommendation letter from the federal client where I am currently working, showing that how important services the company is providing at the federal agency and since I am the project manager.
This is the list of documents that we have come up with to apply for an appeal. IN the mean time I am also filing a new labor with another company under PERM. Since my h1b is expiring in June 2008, if the I-140 get approve during the MTR and doesnt go to appeal stage I will be set, else if it goes to appeal then I am planning to extend the H1 based on appeal and will transfer my h1 to the company where they are filing a new labor for me and file 1-140 from there hence starting from square one again.
I do want an advise from all of you if I am missing something that should file with the MTR/appeal. Any suggestion to improve my MTR/appeal filing is appriciated.
Thanks
RB
Guys please adivse, anybody.
RB
I would first like to thank to all of you who are here to help each other and what a great effort IV is doing.
In my previous post http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=15889
I have requested for help in regards with how to address the ability to pay denial . I have recieved a lot of help for various members and also talking with attorney, here is what we are planning to do as far as the appeal is concern.
1 - Since my company was not paying the proffered wages from the year 2003 to 2006 ( in 2007 they are), my company is agreed to pay me the difference of the salary from the year 2003 in check and will right a statement as to why I didnt get the fully salary before.
2 - Company will provide the last 2-3 months of payroll statement which is more that a milliion dollar.
3 - An audited financial statement of 2007
4- My recent pay stubs
5 - My W2 from 2003-2006
6- Recommendation letter from the federal client where I am currently working, showing that how important services the company is providing at the federal agency and since I am the project manager.
This is the list of documents that we have come up with to apply for an appeal. IN the mean time I am also filing a new labor with another company under PERM. Since my h1b is expiring in June 2008, if the I-140 get approve during the MTR and doesnt go to appeal stage I will be set, else if it goes to appeal then I am planning to extend the H1 based on appeal and will transfer my h1 to the company where they are filing a new labor for me and file 1-140 from there hence starting from square one again.
I do want an advise from all of you if I am missing something that should file with the MTR/appeal. Any suggestion to improve my MTR/appeal filing is appriciated.
Thanks
RB
Guys please adivse, anybody.
RB
wallpaper Breslin 2011 Shankbone.
AbraKaDabra
02-09 01:50 PM
No reasoning just a wild guess. Something looks fishy as all major things e.g. Ban on labor substitution, labor backlog reduction and fee increase are converging to be enacted at the same time. The date may not move a lot in the beginning as a lot of labor applications will fall out of eligibility for 140 but they may move after a lot of 140/485 is filed.
BTW has anyone any experience requesting an earlier biometric appointment for EAD. I am on on 5th EAD and made a silly mistake in calculating the 90 days for applying and now going to india on vacation so i will miss my appointment whenever it arrives. I tried calling their 800 number but nowadays their menu is so strict it doesn't take you anywhere.
BTW has anyone any experience requesting an earlier biometric appointment for EAD. I am on on 5th EAD and made a silly mistake in calculating the 90 days for applying and now going to india on vacation so i will miss my appointment whenever it arrives. I tried calling their 800 number but nowadays their menu is so strict it doesn't take you anywhere.
srmodi
08-16 03:03 PM
Finally I got chance to talk with USCIS officer after explaining my whole scenario and they did confirm that its been rejected because of check value was not correct or sign was missing, I argue him that I have copy of the I-485 which I sent to USCIS and things looks perfect, then he explained that you should wait for rejection notice and then you can refile again. Anyway I already refiled as it is going to retrograte from tomorrow.
Lets see its genuine reason or USCIS mistake.
Lets see its genuine reason or USCIS mistake.
2011 get with Abigail Breslin.
bleutuna
02-25 04:11 PM
LoungeAct's is the way to go as far as I'm concerned. When I read the rules of the battle (unfortunately when it was too late for me to enter, however) what came to my mind was something similar to what LoungAct has done - but with the typography actually evolving rather than the image at the bottom.
My problem with the other two is that while they are beautiful and exciting, the aren't legible. When it comes to typography, the ability to read and understand what you're looking at is immensely important as far as I'm concerned.
MarioFan's work definitely captured the idea of "Evolve" but the word was almost completely indiscernable. Had I not known what the word was in the first place, I don't know if I could have figured out what it was just by looking at his piece :evil:
My problem with the other two is that while they are beautiful and exciting, the aren't legible. When it comes to typography, the ability to read and understand what you're looking at is immensely important as far as I'm concerned.
MarioFan's work definitely captured the idea of "Evolve" but the word was almost completely indiscernable. Had I not known what the word was in the first place, I don't know if I could have figured out what it was just by looking at his piece :evil:
more...
rayoflight
01-08 10:27 AM
Reenergize. Organize. Participate.
MAKE IV HEARD
It is time we all roll up our sleeves and work harder. It is now or never situation. What can we do to motivate all the 30,000 folks to stand up for their own cause.
I am guessing most of them are not realizing the impact and the never ending wait times of 10+ years and by the time they realize to join the efforts it could be a perfect example of "Too Little - Too Late".
IV has a created a Greeting Card to be emailed or print & snail mail but do not see much of the activity on the thread either.
Request to all the members, state chapter leaders and the core team to gear up the momentum.
Reenergize. Organize. Participate.
MAKE IV HEARD
Cheers,
Rayoflight
MAKE IV HEARD
It is time we all roll up our sleeves and work harder. It is now or never situation. What can we do to motivate all the 30,000 folks to stand up for their own cause.
I am guessing most of them are not realizing the impact and the never ending wait times of 10+ years and by the time they realize to join the efforts it could be a perfect example of "Too Little - Too Late".
IV has a created a Greeting Card to be emailed or print & snail mail but do not see much of the activity on the thread either.
Request to all the members, state chapter leaders and the core team to gear up the momentum.
Reenergize. Organize. Participate.
MAKE IV HEARD
Cheers,
Rayoflight
NeedGCNow
07-19 09:51 PM
Folks,
I have applied for my I-140 and I -485 Concurrently as my PD became current in July. I had very less time to file for I- 140 in PP as i have got my my LC only in June 3 rd week. so i filed both of them concurrently.
Now that USCIS is accepting I -485s again , and at the same time there is no PP for I -140 i am not sure whether i will be able to use AC 21 portability after 6 months OR not.
Fellow members please let me know what are the chances of getting the I-140 PP back in August.
Thanks to IV .
I have applied for my I-140 and I -485 Concurrently as my PD became current in July. I had very less time to file for I- 140 in PP as i have got my my LC only in June 3 rd week. so i filed both of them concurrently.
Now that USCIS is accepting I -485s again , and at the same time there is no PP for I -140 i am not sure whether i will be able to use AC 21 portability after 6 months OR not.
Fellow members please let me know what are the chances of getting the I-140 PP back in August.
Thanks to IV .
more...
vengaiah
01-28 02:12 PM
Hi,
I do not have labour ceertificate copy, but I have my I 140 details in I 140 the details like this...
Job Title:- Programmer Analyst
Nontechnical description of job:- Develop customized IT solutions based on a client's needs and business environment.
So, my question is the description does not mention about tech skills, but in the lower portion of my I 140 application they expalin about my skill set..(ex:- .NET, C#, ASP.NET..etc..)
If I want to use AC21 what kind of description I need to maintain???
Thanks in advance..
I do not have labour ceertificate copy, but I have my I 140 details in I 140 the details like this...
Job Title:- Programmer Analyst
Nontechnical description of job:- Develop customized IT solutions based on a client's needs and business environment.
So, my question is the description does not mention about tech skills, but in the lower portion of my I 140 application they expalin about my skill set..(ex:- .NET, C#, ASP.NET..etc..)
If I want to use AC21 what kind of description I need to maintain???
Thanks in advance..
2010 Abigail Breslin earned
franklin
07-10 02:18 PM
I find it rather amazing that people are bickering about one way to donate rather than another. All donations, wherever and however they arrive, are worth pursuing - especially when faced with the prospect of 100's of thousands of dollars.
At one point, I looked at someone's suggestions about how to get the money asked to donate. It included:- think about the money you spend on cable bill / pay per view cricket / "niche market" video rentals (I don't do any of these). Cafeteria lunches? Don't do that either.
This is just another way for me, and I'm sure may others, to comfortably suppliment our donations that we provide to IV directly.
Looking at the list of people who have pledged, there are a fair few IV core member names on there.
At one point, I looked at someone's suggestions about how to get the money asked to donate. It included:- think about the money you spend on cable bill / pay per view cricket / "niche market" video rentals (I don't do any of these). Cafeteria lunches? Don't do that either.
This is just another way for me, and I'm sure may others, to comfortably suppliment our donations that we provide to IV directly.
Looking at the list of people who have pledged, there are a fair few IV core member names on there.
more...
robertkennedy44
03-22 12:01 PM
Looks like K1 is the right way to go. Really appreciate the input -- PLEASE LET ME KNOW if any of you know of a good IMMIGRATION ATTORNEY in New Brunswick.
Thanks!
Robert
Thanks!
Robert
hair Abigail Breslin Photos
prv_1979
09-18 07:39 PM
My idea is...
There should be more than couple people in the same boat (at least 3-4 in this forum it self)
We can all together ask some lawyer like Murthy what could be done in this situation. (They do charge around 500$ per e mail, that I know of, for one person it could be not affordable but we all can share - whoever in the same boat and would like to get a suggestion from a lawyer)
Please put the input, also let me know if this is not a good idea.
thanks
There should be more than couple people in the same boat (at least 3-4 in this forum it self)
We can all together ask some lawyer like Murthy what could be done in this situation. (They do charge around 500$ per e mail, that I know of, for one person it could be not affordable but we all can share - whoever in the same boat and would like to get a suggestion from a lawyer)
Please put the input, also let me know if this is not a good idea.
thanks
more...
pappu
08-27 09:04 AM
hi puding, i am also in the same boat as yours, I need to travel to India during nov 3rd week. I have efiled my AP at nebraska on aug 6th and i am seriously if i will get my AP before that. i have already booked my tickets, and concerned, if i will not get this AP. with the ticket prices these days, even if we postpone/cancel, we lose so much money on top of the AP money that we paid to USCIS. this does not make sense at all. I am going to say this loud, PAPPU or ANY IV admins, can you please help us in this.
We are already helping people facing EAD delays and this issue is linked to it for any processing fix anyways. But we would not take up any individual cases for AP delays at this time. We made a commitment for EAD folks and we will fulfill that. We have helped many people get expedited EADs so that they do not leave their Job or be without driver license. The AP delay is related to it and only a tiny % within this small % that are facing EAd delay will be impacted by it. One would be impacted with AP delays only if the person has to travel. An action item can only be taken up for such folks if there are hundreds of such folks. USCIS would need to see this problem as a widespread issue rather than being faced by a couple of unfortunate people due to case specific reasons. Another lesson learnt while working on EAD delays issue for IV is not to work on issues where people have other options. When people have exhausted all options like service requests, Ombudsman, Senator, Lawyers, info pass etc etc... and they come to IV, we should invest in it. For the EAD delay issue we helped people in mass and many of them were not even donor members or had any interest in IV advocacy work. Such members did not value the hard work we were putting in for getting their EADs approved. We heard nasty comments from some folks as if IV is responsible for their EAD delays/ we are their servants fulfilling all their demands (They will dare not be unprofessional with their lawyers or HR....)... that have demotivated us to work on issues where people are not desperate enough, are not donor members and have no other option left.
We are already helping people facing EAD delays and this issue is linked to it for any processing fix anyways. But we would not take up any individual cases for AP delays at this time. We made a commitment for EAD folks and we will fulfill that. We have helped many people get expedited EADs so that they do not leave their Job or be without driver license. The AP delay is related to it and only a tiny % within this small % that are facing EAd delay will be impacted by it. One would be impacted with AP delays only if the person has to travel. An action item can only be taken up for such folks if there are hundreds of such folks. USCIS would need to see this problem as a widespread issue rather than being faced by a couple of unfortunate people due to case specific reasons. Another lesson learnt while working on EAD delays issue for IV is not to work on issues where people have other options. When people have exhausted all options like service requests, Ombudsman, Senator, Lawyers, info pass etc etc... and they come to IV, we should invest in it. For the EAD delay issue we helped people in mass and many of them were not even donor members or had any interest in IV advocacy work. Such members did not value the hard work we were putting in for getting their EADs approved. We heard nasty comments from some folks as if IV is responsible for their EAD delays/ we are their servants fulfilling all their demands (They will dare not be unprofessional with their lawyers or HR....)... that have demotivated us to work on issues where people are not desperate enough, are not donor members and have no other option left.
hot 62793_video-206557-abigail-
lengthylabor
09-08 06:48 PM
As far as I know you can surely work on H1-B after one year. If you have stayed outside USA for one year , you can continue with H1-B extention ( i.e. remaining time period of your H1-B or even file for new H1-B.
I am not sure about the GC process though. Will be interesting to see some answer on that.
======================================
This is not a legal advise . Please consult a good lawyer for details.
Thanks iad2ead & sagar_nyc
Without going CP,
Assuming my PD (Oct 2004) will not be current in next one year ,Can i work for Employer Y while i'm in India for one year and then comeback to US and work for employer X on H1B and continue with GC processing?
I am not sure about the GC process though. Will be interesting to see some answer on that.
======================================
This is not a legal advise . Please consult a good lawyer for details.
Thanks iad2ead & sagar_nyc
Without going CP,
Assuming my PD (Oct 2004) will not be current in next one year ,Can i work for Employer Y while i'm in India for one year and then comeback to US and work for employer X on H1B and continue with GC processing?
more...
house 0004 - Abigail Breslin
ramus
09-08 05:27 PM
bump....
tattoo Nim (ABIGAIL BRESLIN),
loudoggs
09-12 01:29 PM
Very well explained. Thanks!!
Let me try to explain this, but keep in mind that anything and everything in USCIS is unpredictable!
You asked how is it possible to move the dates back to 2001 after approving cases from 2002 and 2003 in the last 2 months. Here's the answer:
The Cutoff date is set as the PD of the first pending application which is ready to be approved but can not be approved due to unavailability of a visa number.
"Ready to be approved" means all checks are cleared. If they set the PD to say 2003 and approved cases from 2003, that does not mean that ALL cases before that date are ready to be approved. Ssome of them may be stuck in name checks or other checks.. there could be thousands of guys from 2001 and 2002 stuck in various checks. Now after 2 months some of those stuck cases come out of those checks and are ready to be approved, the PD is calculated again and cut off is set to the date of the first application is ready but can not be approved due to unavailability of a visa number.
Assuming there are only 2 visa numbers available per month and they have the following applications pending
Month1
app1 : PD 1/1/2001 stuck in name check
app2 : PD 1/1/2001 stuck in name check
app3 : PD 1/1/2001
app4 : PD 1/1/2002 stuck in name check
app5 : PD 1/1/2002 stuck in name check
app6 : PD 1/1/2003
app7 : PD 1/1/2004
Since they have only visa numbers available for Month1, app3 and app6 can be approved and the cutoff is set to be 1/1/2004(Meaning that applications with PD before 1/1/2004 CAN BE (not WILL BE) approved.
Now they approved app3 and app6 and consumed all numbers available for Month1.
Sometime after this, app1, app2 and app4 come out of name check and aare ready to be approved. Since they only have 2 visas for the next month, they can approve only app1 and app2. App4 becomes the first one that can not be approved due to unavailability, so the PD cutoff for next month is set at 1/1/2002..
I hope this example answers your question as to how the dates can go backwards even after they approve cases with later PDs in the previous months
Let me try to explain this, but keep in mind that anything and everything in USCIS is unpredictable!
You asked how is it possible to move the dates back to 2001 after approving cases from 2002 and 2003 in the last 2 months. Here's the answer:
The Cutoff date is set as the PD of the first pending application which is ready to be approved but can not be approved due to unavailability of a visa number.
"Ready to be approved" means all checks are cleared. If they set the PD to say 2003 and approved cases from 2003, that does not mean that ALL cases before that date are ready to be approved. Ssome of them may be stuck in name checks or other checks.. there could be thousands of guys from 2001 and 2002 stuck in various checks. Now after 2 months some of those stuck cases come out of those checks and are ready to be approved, the PD is calculated again and cut off is set to the date of the first application is ready but can not be approved due to unavailability of a visa number.
Assuming there are only 2 visa numbers available per month and they have the following applications pending
Month1
app1 : PD 1/1/2001 stuck in name check
app2 : PD 1/1/2001 stuck in name check
app3 : PD 1/1/2001
app4 : PD 1/1/2002 stuck in name check
app5 : PD 1/1/2002 stuck in name check
app6 : PD 1/1/2003
app7 : PD 1/1/2004
Since they have only visa numbers available for Month1, app3 and app6 can be approved and the cutoff is set to be 1/1/2004(Meaning that applications with PD before 1/1/2004 CAN BE (not WILL BE) approved.
Now they approved app3 and app6 and consumed all numbers available for Month1.
Sometime after this, app1, app2 and app4 come out of name check and aare ready to be approved. Since they only have 2 visas for the next month, they can approve only app1 and app2. App4 becomes the first one that can not be approved due to unavailability, so the PD cutoff for next month is set at 1/1/2002..
I hope this example answers your question as to how the dates can go backwards even after they approve cases with later PDs in the previous months
more...
pictures Abigail Breslin
apatel_17
02-20 09:36 AM
I am in the RTP area, close to Raleigh.
dresses Abigail Breslin Had To Redo
saveimmigration
01-01 05:06 PM
thanks
more...
makeup abigail breslin 2011. newly
sanan
03-26 11:12 AM
I only got it once in the middle of 2005! Any one else here who did not get a fingerprinting request second time?
USCIS considers fingerprints are only valid for 12
months.
USCIS considers fingerprints are only valid for 12
months.
girlfriend house Abigail Breslin Fangs Up
aps
05-05 12:28 AM
It took more than 5 months for me - The only way I could get it expedited is by going to the CBP Deferred Inspection center at San Francisco. The legal presence verification is done from that office. I got the card the next day after I visited the center and provided the documents - asking to expedite.
You need to take an infopass appointment. Choose zipcode - 94111 when booking the infopass appointment.
The address is:
444 Washington Street
San Francisco, CA 94111.
When you speak to the officer, just mention that your DL is still pending on immigration verification. They will direct you to the correct department on the 7th floor.
Thank you. what are the required docs for this office.? please update?
You need to take an infopass appointment. Choose zipcode - 94111 when booking the infopass appointment.
The address is:
444 Washington Street
San Francisco, CA 94111.
When you speak to the officer, just mention that your DL is still pending on immigration verification. They will direct you to the correct department on the 7th floor.
Thank you. what are the required docs for this office.? please update?
hairstyles Abigail Breslin said she still
casinoroyale
06-27 02:45 PM
Thanks for the clarification.
Yes, H1-B renewal application will not be abondoned when the applicant travels on AP while it is pending. This is what Rajeev Khanna told me.
Yes, H1-B renewal application will not be abondoned when the applicant travels on AP while it is pending. This is what Rajeev Khanna told me.
silent.gear
06-12 09:34 AM
you guys are doing really well guys. keep up the good work.
sweet23guyin
11-28 07:17 PM
In the mean while pls contribute generously to IV. lobbying needs money flow...
![Fashion [ Finds ]](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj9ZQ8UL01_3XRCQgMfPZdGChOY5ahO_q5UmZFnEfSEpAu_TkCf3x8Udf8BAy-_GUgGqlXh_T9hB7JuDE9csa8dLkvLa_C1EoEpaV5SOA__tH2bOKvjRRjlUlVE6Ve7ceHJE0gSo1Vy8VA/w100/Screen+Shot+2013-10-18+at+11.12.15+AM.png)
0 Yorumlar